I’m sure this has been touched on before, by others, more often, and longer-winded, but dammit, I have to play ball too!
Wikipedia is a wonderful place. It’s a great starting point, just like any encyclopedia, for knowledge. If what you find is intriguing, look at the original research and learn more yourself – just like any other print encyclopedia. This isn’t a rant about whether Wikipedia is a legitimate source. It’s flat out not simply because it’s practically the same as an encyclopedia which is also not a legitimate source.
I didn’t say it wasn’t a rant though!
Agreed-upon reality. Wikipedia users submit their thoughts and ideas about the way the world works. There are rules to conform to like weasel words and original research, of course, and anything submitted can be edited by anyone else. The noble goal is a consensus is reached with the best data possible or available and everyone becomes more or most knowledgeable in the process. An article is never complete, but as it approaches completeness, it follows that the number of new edits decrease. Put pessimistically, fewer and fewer people disagree on the reality presented in the article. Completely subjective.
What is reality though? The not-so-simple answer is it is our perception of the world. Following this rabbit hole means that our own personal reality is subjective as too! We even don’t perceive the world “as it happens” either. We are limited by the speed of light. Even things happening on the inside of our brains aren’t instantaneous; there is a lag there as well. Perception of events is inherently behind the times.
Wikipedia helps us codify our collective perception of reality. Sort of like a zeitgeistionary (woah, meta!). Wikipedia, because it is so convenient, is becoming a more common point of reference. Within this reference, it somewhat replaces someone’s own reality with Wikipedia, lowering the number of unique realities. With the number of unique realities approaching one, that makes the world very small.
I feel as though I’m on the cusp of some epiphany here, but it’s just out of my reach at this point; Like I can’t quite wrap my head around the next step. Of note is I mentioned The Zeitgeist, the collective unconscious, the “time spirit.” If it’s written down, it ceases to exist! The power of the zeitgeist is in that it is not documented, it just… is. But for now, I’ll have to ponder on this, and I’d love to hear some feedback on this.
The continuum transfunctioner is a very mysterious and powerful device and its mystery is exceeded only by its power.